This post contains affiliate links. “As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.”
A possible ban from FIFA was one of the reasons the Indian Federation sought an extension to its current Executive Committee …
The All India Football Federation (AIFF) has been in the news lately after its decision to approach the Supreme Court (SC) of India to seek an extension of the mandate of the current Executive Committee.
The committee’s term is scheduled to end on December 21, 2020, but the lack of a Constitution that supposedly does not conform to the National Sports Code has meant that the Indian Federation cannot hold elections to form the next Executive Committee.
In such a case, the possibility existed for the court to appoint an ad-hoc committee to take over the Indian Football Association until the elections were held. One of the reasons the AIFF reached out to the court was to make sure they don’t get a ban from FIFA, which doesn’t take such judicial interference kindly.
objective he has learned that the AIFF has kept FIFA, the Asian Football Confederation (AFC) and the Indian Olympic Association (IOA) informed about developments. By ensuring that the governing bodies of football and Olympic sports in India are aware of the legal dispute, the AIFF is trying to ensure that they do not incur any form of retaliation.
The problem started in October 2017 when the Delhi High Court (HC) annulled the last AIFF elections which were held in December 2016 when Praful Patel was elected president. The HC Delhi stated that the elections were held without following the recently implemented National Sports Code and appointed former Chief Elections Commissioner SY Qureshi as an independent administrator to handle AIFF affairs until new elections are held.
The AIFF approached the Supreme Court against the decision, arguing that India was in danger of being unrecognized by FIFA, which only allows an elected body to run an affiliated federation.
The Supreme Court duly stayed the High Court ruling in November 2017, but appointed two ombudsmen (Qureshi and former India goalkeeper Bhaskar Ganguly) to formulate a new AIFF constitution within eight weeks and then make choices. The court allowed the current members of the Executive Committee to fulfill their duties until then.
However, the new constitution has yet to come before the courts, even after three years.
State associations are also believed to have written to the AIFF, seeking clarity on the elections. It should be noted that AIFF had already sent them a letter informing them of its decision to go to court.
When it comes to Indian football, the next few years are very important. India is set to host the 2022 U-17 Women’s World Cup (after the 2020 event was canceled) and the 2022 AFC Women’s Asian Cup. India has also bid for the hosting rights for the AFC 2027.